(09-19-2015, 11:33 PM)ellajam Wrote:  I love reading this, it brings me there as I fully accept everything. But I still have a problem with the ending. I have been trying to figure out why, I think it might be the your and into or can.
                                                       i try
                                                       the chisel slips
                                                       red becomes the roses 
                                                       as the chisel slips again 
                                                       into my fingers
                                                       that only bleed 
or
                                                       i try
                                                       the chisel slips
                                                       red becomes the roses 
                                                       as the chisel slips again 
                                                       my fingers
                                                       can only bleed 
I think the second one. I know you have thought through every word, but somehow I just can't get your exact choices there.
Thanks for posting it, aside from that nit I continually enjoy it.
The poem is constructed using disyllabic feet (iambs and trochees).
It slips between iambic and trochaic lines with the help of added 
weak and strong ending/beginning syllables. This enables it to maintain 
a disyllabic rhythm while taking advantage of the different emotional 
qualities expressed by each type of line. It also serves to relieve the 
monotony of strictly disyllabic feet.
The variable number of feet in each line, while mainly used to punctuate 
the elements of meaning, also relieve this same monotony by having that 
slight pause we mentally introduced at the end of each line happen
at varying intervals.
And all of this serves to hide the fact the poem is constructed of poetic feet.
I feel it's better for the reader not to know this. What I hope to accomplish
is for the poem to seem natural, smooth, effortless -- and even, at times, 
breathless -- without the knowledge that the whole damn thing is a contrivance. 
(Yes, of course everyone knows the things are the most egregious  
concoctions of trickery and deceit known to women or man; but if we spin 
them around fast enough, they might get dizzy enough to forget it.)
Scansion of those last six lines: 
         i 
try
         the 
chi sel 
slips
         your 
red be
 comes the 
ro ses
         
as the 
chi sel 
slips a
 gain
         in
 to my 
fin gers 
         
that can 
on ly 
bleed
           
Using articles "a,an,the", conjunctions "and,but,or,...", and other tiny words
to manufacture correct feet is cheating. Using them in free verse is -- and 
luckily this has subsided somewhat -- considered abhorrent. Personally, I love 
them as they provide the fresh air needed to let the poem assume its natural voice.
In the case of "the red" and "red", it's not just the rhythm or breath, it's that 
I think "red" holds more emphasis if it is preceded by that tiny "the".
The "your" is there because I want to make sure the "red" is associated foremost 
with the 2nd person and not with the rose.
The "can" is there because it connotes limitation, even despair, at not being able 
to do something as opposed to only doing something.
But the "that", I'll give you, is just a contrivance to satisfy the meter.
And there you have it.
I'm reminded of what a good friend and wonderful poet once said to me:
"If you have to explain it, you need to rewrite it." 
 
But I'm tired of this poem now -- it has taken up too much of my life as it is 
(probably 10 to 12 edits of 15 to 60 minutes) -- so I hope you'll forgive me for 
not attempting a rewite.
I sincerely appreciate you taking the time to comment and you even reading 
the damn thing in the first place.
Ray
P.S. And speaking of taking time: Your pigpen efforts are to be lauded.