07-02-2014, 11:17 AM
(06-30-2014, 12:46 AM)tectak Wrote: You must use EFFECT and not AFFECT. AFFECT is the wrong word and both in the poem and in your explanatory perambulations you confuse by its use, as the reader does not know yet if your word skills are to be trusted. Lier, liar. How do we inspire those who lie to us? Do you mean "inspire"?I agree, I could never figure out "affect vs effect". We inspire liars by rewarding them with fame, political power, and fortune.
Quote:The subjects you say you cover are immensely complex and need clear analysis, one way or the other, to make salient points. This kind of puzzle procedure makes you look a dilettante and it is your fault. As I say until I am bored with myself, once you admit that your poem CAN be explained it begs a question...why didn't you so do IN the poem?
I generally agree with you. I only posted the explanation because too many people couldn't make any sense of the poem (authors fault), I was just trying to clarify it so that I could get better critique.
Quote:I am still in catatonic shock trying to work out how a tool is a euphemism for a fool. Do you mean euphemism? In fact, do you mean tool?
Best and no hard feelings,
this poem is bigger than us both.
tectak
Tool is a pretty common euphemism, or slang. I also like the duality of it, in that the tool is also a tool used by the war machine. Im not sure what the hang up is. I feel you're being silly on this point.
No hard feelings, i appreciate your comments. If you had of written "well, how about that" I wouldn't learn anything.
I like the idea someone had of putting political figures in front of each stanza, I might play with that.

