09-23-2025, 05:20 PM
What I notice here is the story - the destiny depicted. In this story the teller accepts the limits imposed by 'society' (by identifying the limits and struggling, but identification is also an act of creativity and participation) - and by their own choices regarding conformity and aspiration inside their residency of the 'box'. But the problem for me is that the story teller doesn't recognize the 'box' itself as artificial, arbitrary conditions imposed/accepted/self created - they take the 'box' as inevitably the only possibility given in existence and the 'box' is not identified or questioned or situated in a larger set of accessible potentials. What is depicted is a 'struggle' for liberation, but liberation only as defined in relation to the original conditions which are treated as compulsory when they are finally not.