Yesterday, 08:56 AM
I would consider this mostly an edit if one considers the original text a poem. I don't, but as Quix pointed out, much of Rowan's writing comes across as poetic. It could be argued that it is just lyrical prose but the original does not follow standard formatting for prose in that the line breaks aren't determined by standard page formatting.
The content of the text or its relative worth is irrelevant to this particular discussion. The issue is whether the text was sufficiently reimagined. As I mentioned, I think it is mostly an edit of the original, however the title and the original text do lend some additional context/meaning though subtle. So, I stand by my original conclusion that this really represents a rewrite or edit rather that an original work but in the end is no different than if it had been posted in the original thread.
The content of the text or its relative worth is irrelevant to this particular discussion. The issue is whether the text was sufficiently reimagined. As I mentioned, I think it is mostly an edit of the original, however the title and the original text do lend some additional context/meaning though subtle. So, I stand by my original conclusion that this really represents a rewrite or edit rather that an original work but in the end is no different than if it had been posted in the original thread.