06-09-2010, 11:59 AM
(06-09-2010, 08:57 AM)billy Wrote: my turn
what i've noticed in this thread is this.
we all think vilks wasn't breaking laws.
some think he wasn't making a social statement but flagrantly trying to improve his stature by spreading hate.
we all think the retaliation he go was illegal.
what i find a little offensive is this.
a person draws a cartoon , knowing it will in all intent and purpose create or at the very least antagonize religious hatred.
the same person then expects round the clock police protection.
i find it hard to believe he didn't know what the outcome would be. he could have sent the cartoon in anon. and save all the hoohah, but he chose to be famous instead.
personally i'd say stop paying the police to protect idiots like this and put them to better use.
we're all accountable for our actions though in this instance it seems that some are less accountable than others.
was the brave. i don't think so. i think he was greedy for fame jmo
YES ... YES ... YES!!! :metal:
You give to the world when you're giving your best to somebody else.